Knowledge Workers Need Periods of Inattention

"I had this idea while I was in the shower..." How many times have you used that sentence to introduce your new idea that was so novel, so compelling, you knew it couldn't fail? Or maybe you weren't in the shower—maybe you were weeding the garden, chopping wood, or simply stepping away from your desk for a fresh cup of tea, when suddenly the puzzle you'd been trying to untangle for hours, days, or weeks is solved in an instant?

This is the power of thinking without thinking, the knowledge you can suddenly access when you turn your conscious brain off. It's the spontaneous understanding that arises when you've fully internalized a problem, but haven't fully formulated a solution. It's the idea you get when you stop thinking so hard.

Malcolm Gladwell gets at some of this in Blink, but there he's mostly talking about applying deeply cultivated expertise to new situations. I'm talking about another predicament, and one that's probably more common: the insight we can access when we pause, step back, and let our minds work on the problem while our hands work on something else. It's the idea we get when we remove ourselves from deliberation, and let ourselves sink into ideation.

Sometimes an idea comes during reverie—staring out the window, perhaps—but often it comes when we simply stop paying direct attention to an idea and start up a physical process. The process might be weeding or washing or driving, but it's likely one that uses our motor skills more than our intellect. I find that natural and repetitive actions let me work without a lot of conscious thinking, letting my mind explore freely. These are some of my most synthetic moments; the moments when I have good ideas.

It happened one morning this week while commuting in to work. I had the radio on, and was thinking about and noticing a lot of things along the way: the crows by the side of the road, my husband's trip this week to Chicago, my deadline at work. I wasn't thinking about anything in particular; I was paying attention, in a very inattentive way, to the road in front of me, and to the stories in my head. Suddenly I had an idea for a marketing promo to try at work, an idea that synthesized a story on the radio with the time of the year with my client's current marketing goals. When I got to work I tried my new idea, and it worked, famously. I don't believe I could have arrived at that idea while sitting at my desk trying to think it up. I needed to be away from the demands of focused thinking, steeped in a fluid near-trance of mechanical activity, to arrive at my good idea.

Knowledge workers—those of us who make our living by our subject matter expertise rather than by our manual labor—need to remember this important phenomenon. In spite of everything, we need, sometimes, to stop paying attention, to stop trying so hard. This might be the best way to produce our best ideas.


Passing the Turing Test

Yesterday I received two email inquiries into my willingness to sell one of my domain names. This is not uncommon. The first email was typical: formulaic, slightly odd grammar, a few misspellings. Only one line about the domain name itself. Could easily have been generated algorithmically by an app walking a database.

The second one was different. It was personable. It was friendly. The grammar was good (huzzah). It made note of this weblog, and referenced actual posts. In short, it was generated by a living, breathing, human. It was believable.

Which is the point of the Turing test. The machine convinced me it was human. And so it was.

Information Underload, or, The Medium is No Longer the Message

The Pew Internet & American Life Project (http://www.pewinternet.org/) recently published a report on the role of the internet in helping people make major life decisions. Their report shows 45% of internet users, or about 60 million Americans, went online last year to find information to help them cope with a major illness, secure a job or a place to live, buy a car, choose a college, or make a financial investment. (The report is available for download - 264K PDF.)

Why use the internet? It's simple - it works. For those five decision types above, only 5% of online users felt they got bad information, and nearly two-thirds of users felt the internet was their most important source of information compared to other, offline sources.

More significant, these users "do not feel overwhelmed by the amount of information to consider in making decisions. Information overload was not experienced by the majority of those who relied heavily on the internet in the five key decisions." This is excellent news. It means the web is finally becoming - at least for experienced users - a viable research option, with enough rich content to satisfy users. It also implies that web information design and information architecture best practices are finally taking hold. And it shows that our collective information literacy is rising: that far from feeling overwhelmed, internet users are canny and judicious in their exploratory behavior.

Marshall McLuhan famously quipped that "the medium is the message." But as the information age progresses, the significance of the medium decreases. The information is the message; content is king. People care less how they get it than that they get it. The medium becomes transparent.

SEARCH



Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported